Swolecharts
Live crypto data · 10 exchanges

LISTA perp index risk

Each exchange prices LISTA perp liquidations from a mark price built on an index: a weighted basket of spot prices. This page shows each index's composition and an estimate of how much resting spot liquidity backs it.

Source: exchange public APIsIndex constituents hourly, depth every 5 min, UTCModel static-book v1As of 19:29 UTC

Index depth is a static-book estimate for the index, not the mark. Static-book estimates from public exchange data. Not a real cost to move any price, not a mark-price forecast, and not trading advice. Methodology and limitations · Constituent changes · All perps

Indexes: Binance LISTAUSDT · Bitget LISTAUSDT

Binance LISTAUSDT index

index LISTAUSDT · constituents 2026-10-02 19:19Z

Composition and constituent price vs index median (observed)

ConstituentPairType WeightSnapshot price vs median Guard
BinanceLISTAUSDTspot 70.2%0.0834
2026-10-02
19:19Z
+0.00%
BitgetLISTAUSDTspot 10.5%0.08308
2026-10-02
19:19Z
-0.38%
MEXCLISTAUSDTspot 10.5%0.08319
2026-10-02
19:19Z
-0.25%
GateLISTA_USDTspot 7.0%0.08353
2026-10-02
19:19Z
+0.16%
binance_cross3LISTATRY/USDTTRYcross 1.8%0.0834011
2026-10-02
19:19Z
+0.00%

Prices as published by Binance with the composition; each price shows its observed snapshot time in UTC. Widest constituent spread 0.54%. Guard: Binance caps a source more than 3% from the median (exchange doc, rule set binance-usdm-2026-09-25). Modelled index from these prices: 0.0833534.

Mark and index

Observed mark 0.083570, last price 0.083560 (5-minute bucket starting 2026-10-02 19:25Z; mark observation time unavailable). Mark vs modelled index comparison withheld: the sources cannot establish a same-minute observation. Composition prices above are separate snapshots and may have drifted. No modelled mark move is shown for this perp.

Index depth and est. liquidation exposure

No static-book estimate for this perp yet: index depth is only estimated for perps whose spot books are sampled. Today that covers 108 coins (Binance 16, Bybit 73, Bitget 60); the majors are not sampled yet. Covered examples: ACE, ACT, AIGENSYN, AIXBT, ALICE, APEX. The composition and guard above still apply.

Bitget LISTAUSDT index

index LISTAUSDT · constituents 2026-10-02 18:36Z · coverage Ok

Composition and constituent price vs index median (observed)

ConstituentPairType WeightSnapshot price vs median Guard
BinanceLISTA/USDTspot 80.9%0.0849
2026-10-02
18:36Z
-0.09%
MEXCLISTA/USDTspot 15.8%0.08496
2026-10-02
18:36Z
-0.02%
BitgetLISTA/USDTspot 1.3%0.08532
2026-10-02
18:36Z
+0.40%
KuCoinLISTA/USDTspot 1.1%0.0852
2026-10-02
18:36Z
+0.26%
GateLISTA/USDTspot 0.8%0.08498
2026-10-02
18:36Z
+0.00%

Prices as published by Bitget with the composition; each price shows its observed snapshot time in UTC. Widest constituent spread 0.49%. Guard: Bitget drops a source more than 5% from the median (exchange doc, rule set bitget-usdtm-2025-10-13). Modelled index from these prices: 0.0849189.

Mark and index

Observed mark 0.083580, last price 0.083580 (5-minute bucket starting 2026-10-02 19:25Z; mark observation time unavailable). Mark vs modelled index comparison withheld: the sources cannot establish a same-minute observation. Composition prices above are separate snapshots and may have drifted. No modelled mark move is shown for this perp.

Index depth and est. liquidation exposure

RangeIndex depth (est.) Depth / OI Est. liquidation exposureof which observed Exposure-to-depth ratio (est.)
+2%$15k0.5% $340k$022x est.
+5%$34k1.2% $530k$016x est.
-2%$11k0.4% $340k$029x est.
-5%$24k0.8% $530k$023x est.

Sensitivity (uncalibrated). Index depth to +5% under 0.5x $17k, 1x $34k, 2x $69k book refill. Index depth to -5% under 0.5x $12k, 1x $24k, 2x $47k book refill. The multipliers are assumptions, not fitted to observed events.

Coverage 100% of index weight modelled. Included OI $2.8M (100% complete, exposure ok). Confidence high. Estimate 2026-10-02 19:24Z, books 2026-10-02 19:22Z, exposure 2026-10-02 19:20Z. Models: static-book v1; bitget-usdtm-2025-10-13; liq-in-range v1; prior hl-2026-09-27.

Index depth history (est.): collecting history, 4 hourly points so far. The chart appears once 24 are stored.

Constituent divergence history, last 30 days

No constituent divergence recorded for LISTA in the last 30 days.

Index, not mark. Index depth is a static-book estimate of resting spot liquidity between the index and the stated move, after the exchange's guard. Liquidations use the mark price, which also follows the perp's own price and basis. Static-book estimates from public exchange data. Not a real cost to move any price, not a mark-price forecast, and not trading advice.

Method. Constituents and weights come from each exchange's public index API, refreshed hourly. Spot order books are sampled every 5 minutes. Sources we cannot read are held fixed, so the figure is neither an upper nor a lower bound. See how mark and index prices work and the constituent change log.

LISTA index risk FAQ

What does this page show?

For each LISTA perpetual on Binance, OKX, Bybit and Bitget: the spot sources the exchange uses for its index and their weights, how far each source's price currently sits from the median of the others (observed), the exchange's published outlier guard, and a static-book estimate of resting spot liquidity between the index and +/-2% and +/-5%.

Is index depth the amount needed to move the mark price?

No. Liquidations use the mark price, which also depends on the perp's own price and basis. Index depth is a static-book estimate for the index only: real books refill and arbitrage closes gaps, so it is neither an upper nor a lower bound on any real-world figure.

What do the coverage states mean?

OK: at least 80% of index weight comes from order books we read, books under 15 minutes old and constituents under 2 hours old. Partial: 50-80% modelled, the rest held fixed. Stale: the last estimate is older than that and is shown greyed. Insufficient: composition only, no depth or ratio.

Why is the sensitivity marked uncalibrated?

It multiplies the static-book figure by 0.5x, 1x and 2x to show how much the estimate depends on book refill. The multipliers are not fitted to observed events yet, so treat them as a range of assumptions, not a measurement.